A central conceptual problem of particle physics has been to establish
an appropriately tight connection between an account of the basic
building blocks of matter (fundamental theory) and experimental
predictions (phenomenological models). This paper traces the range of
responses to this problem from the inception of particle physics around
1930 to the present day. It shows that the fundamentalist impulse, that
is, the desire to develop a theory of the fundamental structure of the
physical world, has been a dominant goal of the field. The paper argues
that fundamental theories in particle physics face serious theoretical
and conceptual problems. Of course, with a stringent enough criterion
for "tight connection" (such as deductive entailment) one can argue that
in no field of science does fundamental theory apply (Cartwright 1983).
The argument against fundamental laws in particle physics does not use
such a criterion.